On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 11:55:57 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Check.java line 464: >> >>> 462: } >>> 463: for (Symbol sym = s.owner; sym != null; sym = sym.owner) { >>> 464: if (sym.kind == TYP && sym.name == name && sym.name != >>> names.error && >> >> Looks good! > > I recommend adding a test for this (if not already done) - checking cases > like: > > // A.java > void m() { } > class A {} > > > but also where A is nested deeper: > > > // A.java > void m() { } > class B { > class A { } > } > > > And then also check that the test still works for other classes defined in > the implicit unit: > > > // A.java > void m() { } > class B { > class B { } //error > } Added ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16461#discussion_r1399513053