core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [External] : Operating System and Architecture API Nir Lisker
• Integrated: 8382615: Expand MinMaxVector benchmark to floating point values Galder Zamarreño
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v9] Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8393247: Pattern \X and \b{g} handling of UAX #29 GB11 Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e duke
  • Integrated: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8393337: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026e Andrew John Hughes
• RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v2] Stefan Karlsson
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v15] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8393327: Missed ValueObjectMethods class initialization in JNIHandles::is_same_object David Holmes
• Integrated: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Joe Wang
• RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393382: [VectorAPI] AbstractMask.intoArray should be force inlined Vladimir Ivanov
• RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8393242: jlink fails with "Multiple modules contain non-empty package" for a non-package resource directory in more than one module Dušan Bálek
• RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v2] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Integrated: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
• [External] : Stable, Cache-aware, Faster sorting algorithm. shreyas patil
• Withdrawn: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion duke
• Re: RFR: 8322292: Rearrange comparison of fields in Record.equals() [v7] Sergey Tsypanov
• RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v12] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v13] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v131] Doug Lea
• [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month sbracely
• RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v11] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v10] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Integrated: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
• RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai

• Earlier messages
• Later messages