On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:47:38 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/TEST.groups line 28: >> >>> 26: # >>> 27: >>> 28: all = \ >> >> Why no `jdk_all` definition in this case? > > Tried not to introduce new `*_all` groups here. `jdk_all` would be the same > as `jdk:all`, TBH. But we still can do it for symmetry reasons, see new > commit. "all" looks okay but the comment "Catch-all" suggests something else, shouldn't be "All tests"? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17422#discussion_r1453103766
