On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:29:49 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > If `--enable-runtime-link-image` is enabled, the JDK image does not > > > include the packaged modules. > > > > > > That's not true. Right now `--enable-runtime-link-image` modifies how the > > `lib/modules` image looks like (adds a bunch of extra resources). That's > > it. It doesn't modify the setup of packaged modules. > > It is true that they are orthogonal. jlink does allow to produce a linkable > image with `--keep-packaged-modules` and the resulting JDK image would work. More so, the compatibility to the status quo would be better (in terms of produced build output). > However, the goal of this work is to produce a JDK image with smaller > footprint. This is a question to JDK build to allow configuring building a > linkable image with packaged modules. IMO something like that could be achieved by creating a separate bundle (take the JDK image, but don't include the packaged modules, for example). > In addition, `--enable-keep-packaged-modules` is enabled by default. Do you > want the linkable image includes `jmods` as it's currently implemented in > this PR? Yes we do. The main reason being that the `jdk` image has more to it than just the image. `src.zip`, CDS data, `demo` and so on. We don't want to duplicate that. To us, including the `jmods` folder is something that comes into play when actually producing the bundles of the JDK. The linkable runtime option allows for a more flexible distribution of the resulting JDK. With or without packaged modules without limiting `jlink` usage (for the common use-cases). If somebody truly wanted to *not* have the packaged modules after a build with a runtime-linkable-image that's possible with the following configure options: `--enable-linkable-runtime-image --disable-keep-packaged-modules`. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2003848668
