On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:23:03 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The problem is that the project is a joined work and has multiple variants >> of copyrights (see the readme). I don’t think it’s on the safe side to pick >> a single (non recent) copyright - especially if you change attribution after >> the fact. But that’s just me. This is especially a problem because the file >> does NOT contain a dual license claim - the claim is in the readme with this >> text: >> >>> Intellectual property >> >>> This code is copyright (c) 2014-2023 Jean-Philippe Aumasson, Daniel J. >>> Bernstein. It is dual-licensed >>> [CC0](https://github.com/veorq/SipHash/blob/master/LICENCE_CC0) and >>> [MIT](https://github.com/veorq/SipHash/blob/master/LICENSE_MIT). > > Copyright and license are two different things. The project has a dual > license which we attribute. Code in different files can have different > copyrights (as is the case in e.g. our own OpenJDK code). We copied the > copyright from the file that we looked at. If you feel it has the wrong > copyright please contact the authors of that file and ask them to update > their code. The file has a different license also. Either you use the joined copyright and dual license or only the single copyright and cc0 license which is in the file. But I asked DJB to clarify. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18455#discussion_r1538369236
