On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:21:32 GMT, Adam Sotona <asot...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> java.base java.lang.invoke package heavily uses ASM to generate lambdas and >> method handles. >> >> This patch converts ASM calls to Classfile API. >> >> This PR is continuation of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12945 >> >> Any comments and suggestions are welcome. >> >> Please review. >> >> Thank you, >> Adam > > Adam Sotona has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 12 additional > commits since the last revision: > > - applied suggested changes > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8294960-invoke > - Reversion of ClassBuilder changes > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8294960-invoke > - Apply suggestions from code review > > Co-authored-by: liach <7806504+li...@users.noreply.github.com> > - Apply suggestions from code review > > Co-authored-by: liach <7806504+li...@users.noreply.github.com> > - added missing comment > - fixed InnerClassLambdaMetafactory for hidden caller classes > - performance improvements > - consolidation of descriptors handling > - ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ee3b164d...304054b9 Thank you for the review. > How is the performance result compared to using ASM? I've actually triggered a large set of benchmarks to see the impact. Any hint which benchmarks to focus on would be welcome. Thank you. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17108#issuecomment-2061616868
