On Fri, 17 May 2024 23:47:45 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibb...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only 
>> using AVX2 instructions.  This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average 
>> 1.3x for AVX2.  The benchmark numbers:
>> 
>> 
>> Benchmark                                                   Score            
>> Latest          
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithMediumSub   343.573                317.934         
>> 0.925375393x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub1    1039.081              1053.96         
>> 1.014319384x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub2        55.828            110.541         
>> 1.980027943x
>> StringIndexOf.constantPattern                        9.361           11.906  
>>         1.271872663x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharLongSuccess          4.216           4.218           
>> 1.000474383x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharMediumSuccess        3.133           3.216           
>> 1.02649218x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharShortSuccess 3.76                    3.761           
>> 1.000265957x
>> StringIndexOf.success                                        9.186           
>> 9.713           1.057369911x
>> StringIndexOf.successBig                           14.341            46.343  
>>         3.231504079x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_String   6220.918              12154.52        
>>         1.953814533x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_char     5503.556              5540.044        
>>         1.006629895x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_String   6978.854              6818.689        
>>         0.977049957x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_char     5657.499              5474.624        
>>         0.967675646x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_String          7132.541              
>> 6863.359                0.962260014x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_char  16013.389             16162.437         
>> 1.009307711x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_String          7386.123            14771.622 
>>         1.999915517x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_char    9901.671              9782.245        
>>         0.987938803
>
> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Addressing lots of comments.  Interim commit.

src/hotspot/cpu/x86/c2_MacroAssembler_x86.cpp line 4737:

> 4735:     bind(COMPARE_BYTE);
> 4736:   } else {
> 4737:     lea(ary1, Address(ary1, expand_ary2 ? 4 : 2));

This change is not required. expand_ary2 code doesn't come here.

src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1233:

> 1231:   __ andq(eq_mask, rTmp);
> 1232: 
> 1233:   __ testl(eq_mask, eq_mask);

Mismatch of operation size q vs l: andq and testl.

src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1623:

> 1621:     
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> 1622:     //
> 1623:     // Small haystack (<32 bytes) switch

This should be <= 32 bytes.

src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64_string.cpp line 1709:

> 1707:     //  XMM_BYTE_K - last element of needle, broadcast
> 1708:     //
> 1709:     //  The haystack is >= 32 bytes

Should this be > 32 bytes?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1609023624
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1609043720
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1609160143
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1609163535

Reply via email to