On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:14:07 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review of this change which updates the API specification 
>> of `java.util.zip.InflaterInputStream.skip()` method to match its current 
>> implementation?
>> 
>> `InflaterInputStream.skip()`, just like `DeflaterInputStream.skip()`, takes 
>> a `long` value `n` representing the number of bytes to skip. When a value 
>> greater than `Integer.MAX_VALUE` is passed to this 
>> `InflaterInputStream.skip()` method, the current implementation in that 
>> method only skips at most `Integer.MAX_VALUE` bytes. 
>> `DeflaterInputStream.skip()` too has the same behaviour. However, in the 
>> case of `DeflaterInputStream.skip()`, this semantic is clearly noted in that 
>> method's API documentation. `InflaterInputStream.skip()` currently doesn't 
>> specify this behaviour.
>> 
>> The commit in this PR updates the `InflaterInputStream.skip()` to specify 
>> the current implementation.
>> 
>> I'll open a CSR for this change.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   clarify blocking semantic

Thank you all for the reviews and the inputs to the specification text. The CSR 
has been approved, so I'll integrate this now.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19515#issuecomment-2150413847

Reply via email to