On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:51:48 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Proposing a new overload method for `Process#waitFor()` which takes a 
>> `Duration` for the timeout value. This will reduce the possibility for 
>> making mistakes with the `TimeUnit` in the other overload method. A 
>> corresponding CSR has also been drafted.
>
> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   removed a blank line

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java line 504:

> 502:      */
> 503:     public boolean waitFor(Duration duration) throws 
> InterruptedException {
> 504:         Objects.requireNonNull(duration, "duration");

Does this explicit null-check pull its weight here?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20220#discussion_r1683585609

Reply via email to