On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:42:17 GMT, SendaoYan <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>>   After [JDK-8294960](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294960), the 
>> footprint memory usage increased significantly when run the testcase with 
>> -Xcomp jvm options, then cause the testcase was killed by docker by OOM.
>>   Maybe the footprint memory usage increased was inevitable, so I think we 
>> should increase the smallest memory limite for this testcase.
>>   Only change the testcase, the change has been verified, no risk.
>
>> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with these tests.
> 
>> After [JDK-8294960](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294960), the 
>> codecache usage increased significantly, non-profiled 3068Kb->3583Kb, 
>> profiled 6408Kb->7846Kb.
> 
> Can you confirm that the codecache usage increased is expected or not after 
> [JDK-8294960](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294960) with -Xcomp jvm 
> option.

> @sendaoYan, Given Adam's inputs and the reviews you have had for this change, 
> I think you should be able to go ahead and integrate this.

Thanks all for the review. Can you sponsor this PR for me. @jaikiran

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19864#issuecomment-2238306043

Reply via email to