core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v105] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Vladimir Kozlov
  • Integrated: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v104] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] duke
  • Integrated: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
• RFR: 8387949: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v3] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v4] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Christoph Langer
  • Integrated: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v6] Galder Zamarreño
• RFR: 8382938: jar tool will create multi-release jars where different versions are incompatible Christian Stein
• Re: [External] : Speeding up InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() Markus KARG
• Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow [v2] Galder Zamarreño
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v22] Eric Fang
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal April Ivy
• RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants Alex Buckley
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants Jan Lahoda
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v4] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: JDK-8387985: sun/tools/jstat tests fail on platforms without Parallel GC Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC sendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v2] Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC Elif Aslan
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v9] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
• RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Valerie Peng
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v103] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Sholto

• Earlier messages
• Later messages