On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:36:49 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lance Andersen has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update @link ->@linkplain
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipEntry.java line 41:
>
>> 39: * This class is used to represent a ZIP file entry.
>> 40: * <P>
>> 41: * The combined length of the entry name, the extra field data, the
>
> "bytes" is the last word here, so technically this is correct. But an
> external reader may easily think this refers to the string lengths, not the
> byte encoded lengths.
>
> So maybe being slightly more explicit that the encoded length depends on the
> chosen charset would reduce ambiguity?
I am not sure it is needed, but could tweak to
> The combined length, after encoding, of the ......
thoughts?
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/ZipOutputStream.java line 642:
>
>> 640: if (e.comment != null) {
>> 641: commentBytes = zc.getBytes(e.comment);
>> 642: clen = Math.min(commentBytes.length, 0xffff);
>
> Moving the headerLength enforcement earlier in the method would remove the
> need for this comment truncation, right?
I left that intentionally for now. A follow on PR will be updating the
ZipEntry javadoc to reduce the max size of the validation check once this PR is
finalized.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21003#discussion_r1760977017
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21003#discussion_r1760962573