On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:50:49 GMT, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that >> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and >> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run >> JShell/REPL, not the `java` executable, but it is difficult find out about >> JShell. >> >> The proposal herein is to print a much shorter help, together with a pointer >> to JShell, when the executable does not know what to do. I.e. there is >> nothing specified to start, and no option like `--help` is specified. In >> particular, on my machine, it prints: >> >> openjdk version "24-internal" 2025-03-18 >> >> Usage: java [java options...] <application> [application arguments...] >> >> Where <application> is one of: >> <mainclass> to execute the main method of a compiled main >> class >> -jar <jarfile>.jar to execute the main class of a JAR archive >> -m <module>[/<mainclass>] to execute the main class of a module >> <sourcefile>.java to compile and execute a source-file program >> >> Where key java options include: >> --class-path <class path> >> where <class path> is a list of directories and JAR archives to search >> for class files, separated by ":" >> --module-path <module path> >> where <module path> is a list of directories and JAR archives to search >> for modules, separated by ":" >> >> For additional help on usage: java --help >> For an interactive Java environment: jshell >> >> >> Hopefully, this may be easier both for people trying to run something, and >> for people that are really looking for JShell. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks! > > Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The pull request now contains 14 commits: > > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8340133-2 > - - suffixing <jarfile> and <sourcefile> with .jar and .java in both the > concise and full help. > - using a stderr version instead of the stdout version. > - Reflecting review feedback: > - using "conciseVersionString" intead of "shortVersionString" > - using <jarfile>.jar <jarfile> > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8340133-2 > - Using correct pplaceholders. > - Adjusting text as suggested. > - Cleaning up the concise message: > - using 2 spaces instead of 4, > - rewording the "for more use --help" part of the message as suggested to > avoid the word "launcher". > - Using lowercase for the keys in the help, using 'source-file' program > instead of 'single-file' program. > - Using an enum instead of booleans, as suggested. > - Adjusting the concise help as suggested: 'using main class of a JAR > archive' and '<JarFile>.jar'/'<SourceFile>.java' > - ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/dfddbcaa...439fa40f I think it makes sense to include the version. I have no strong opinions on the format. Is the extract in the PR description updated with the latest version changes? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21411#issuecomment-2484129128
