On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:23:29 GMT, Justin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/TimeZone.java line 659:
>>
>>> 657: * @since 25
>>> 658: */
>>> 659: public static synchronized Stream<String> availableIDs(int
>>> rawOffset) {
>>
>> Why are these new methods synchronized? I think the streams and the
>> spliterators are late-binding, so the synchronization does not synchronize
>> the access to the underlying arrays. synchronized modifier also does not
>> appear in Javadoc and is not part of the API surface, so it can be safely
>> removed.
>
> Right, it can be removed. Actually, I think `getAvailableIDs()` and
> `getAvailableIDs(int)` also do not need to be synchronized. The internal IDs
> are eagerly initialized in the static block of `ZoneInfoFile.java` and are
> effectively final and not modified.
Yep; their synchronized are incorrect. The object monitor lock should have been
on `ZoneInfoFile.class` to be effective.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23251#discussion_r1927788351
