On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:53:13 GMT, Christian Hagedorn <chaged...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Is this going to be GC independent? What if the VM swaps to another GC >> ergonomically? > > The test runs with `vm.flagless`. But I suggest to just go with `>= 1` > instead to be on the safe side. The purpose of this IR rule in the context of > this test is really just that it does not fail and not about catching real > issues/verifying the IR. > > If we still want to test the improved loop unrolling opportunities, I suggest > to create a separate IR test for it, possibly in a separate RFE. I suppose that's probably not possible, as far as I know we always run with G1GC, so it should be fine :) We could put an upper bound of 3, maybe 4 here though. Just see what passes. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23739#discussion_r2336663260
