On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:44:38 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Small doc enhancement to use the term "representation equivalence" in a few
>> more locations.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Fix typo found in code review.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Double.java line 1462:
> 1460: * @apiNote
> 1461: * One idiom to implement {@linkplain
> 1462: * Double##repEquivalence representation equivalence} on {@code
Suggestion:
* ##repEquivalence representation equivalence} on {@code
for consistency with the similar change in `equals()`
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Float.java line 874:
> 872: * returns the identical {@code int} value when applied to
> 873: * each.
> 874: * In other words, {@linkplain ##repEquivalence representation
Suggestion:
* In other words, {@linkplain Double##repEquivalence representation
I think the class name is needed here.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27232#discussion_r2343493915
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27232#discussion_r2343494067
