On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:59:53 GMT, Jorn Vernee <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think what Maurizio is suggesting is probably the most flexible. We can > assume that e.g. a 4 byte allocation is at least 4 byte aligned, and an 8 > byte allocation is also at least 8 bytes aligned (which implies 4 byte > alignment as well), up to a value equal to `alignof(max_align_t)`, which we > currently assume to be 16 (though, we could have a native method that > actually returns `alignof(max_align_t)`). I see now. This makes sense to me. Thank you for explaining it. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28235#issuecomment-3528802206
