On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:14:41 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon <[email protected]> wrote:

>> This PR proposes adding a new overload to `MemorySegment::getString` that 
>> takes a known byte length of the content.
>> 
>> This was previously proposed in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/20725, 
>> but the outcome of 
>> [JDK-8333843](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333843) was to update 
>> `MemorySegment#getString` to suggest
>> 
>> 
>>     byte[] bytes = new byte[length];
>>     MemorySegment.copy(segment, JAVA_BYTE, offset, bytes, 0, length);
>>     return new String(bytes, charset);
>> 
>> 
>> However this is less efficient than what the implementation of getString 
>> does after [JDK-8362893](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8362893), it 
>> now uses `JavaLangAccess::uncheckedNewStringNoRepl` to avoid the copy.
>> 
>> See also discussion in [this panama-dev@ 
>> thread](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/panama-dev/2025-November/021193.html),
>>  and mcimadamore's document [Pulling the (foreign) 
>> string](https://cr.openjdk.org/~mcimadamore/panama/strings_ffm.html)
>> 
>> Benchmark results:
>> 
>> 
>> Benchmark                                 (size)  Mode  Cnt    Score   Error 
>>  Units
>> ToJavaStringTest.jni_readString                5  avgt   30   55.339 ± 0.401 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.jni_readString               20  avgt   30   59.887 ± 0.295 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.jni_readString              100  avgt   30   84.288 ± 0.419 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.jni_readString              200  avgt   30  119.275 ± 0.496 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.jni_readString              451  avgt   30  193.106 ± 1.528 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_copyLength             5  avgt   30    7.348 ± 0.048 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_copyLength            20  avgt   30    7.440 ± 0.125 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_copyLength           100  avgt   30   11.766 ± 0.058 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_copyLength           200  avgt   30   16.096 ± 0.089 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_copyLength           451  avgt   30   25.844 ± 0.054 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readString             5  avgt   30    5.857 ± 0.046 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readString            20  avgt   30    7.750 ± 0.046 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readString           100  avgt   30   14.109 ± 0.187 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readString           200  avgt   30   18.035 ± 0.130 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readString           451  avgt   30   35.896 ± 0.227 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readStringLength       5  avgt   30    4.565 ± 0.038 
>>  ns/op
>> ToJavaStringTest.panama_readStringLength      20...
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add a dstOffset parameter, stop using 
> StringCharBuffer/CharsetEncoder::encode

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/String.java line 2019:

> 2017:     }
> 2018: 
> 2019:     boolean bytesCompatible(Charset charset, int srcIndex, int 
> numChars) {

Surprisingly here we don't do anything for the case where the string is UTF16 
and the target charset is also UTF16?

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/String.java line 2030:

> 2028:     }
> 2029: 
> 2030:     void copyToSegmentRaw(MemorySegment segment, long offset, int 
> srcIndex, int numChars) {

This method takes an index, expressed in chars, and uses that as a byte offset 
in a bulk copy operation. I don't think this is correct. E.g. if the string is 
UTF16 (and not LATIN1), there is a scaling factor to be applied?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28043#discussion_r2542331027
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28043#discussion_r2542323659

Reply via email to