On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:39:31 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> A lot of core reflection APIs are from antique times, which have their own >> null handling behavior. Such behaviors are often not documented in the >> specification; we should document rejected null arguments and accepted null >> arguments (including array elements) explicitly. >> >> In the investigation, I found `Class.isNestmateOf` (inconsistent) and >> `AnnotatedType`'s implementation of `AnnotatedElement` methods (required by >> specification) are missing null checks. I consider these unlikely to be a >> user dependency and added new null checks. > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Redundant extra sentences Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28336#pullrequestreview-3483520073
