On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 16:48:34 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to revert the changes 
> that were done to `java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream` in Java 23 through 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7036144?
> 
> As noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8381670, that change in 
> JDK-7036144 introduced a couple of regressions. One of them was a performance 
> regression which was addressed recently 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8374644. The other one is a currently 
> open issue https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8377896.
> 
> Given these regressions, I believe it's appropriate to revert the changes 
> done in JDK-7036144 to bring back the implementation of `GZIPInputStream` to 
> the state which was there prior to Java 23. That implementation has been 
> around for several decades and has now shown that the usage of 
> `InputStream.available()` is serving its purpose in that part of the code. 
> Like noted in JDK-8381670, there may be ways to fix these regressions and yet 
> avoid the usage of `InputStream.available()`, but those experiments are 
> better done as an enhancement and in their own time, allowing for evaluating 
> whether the change/enhancement is worth doing at all. In the meantime, it 
> would benefit to revert the JDK-7036144 change.
> 
> This PR was created by doing a "git revert 
> a4fb07ee3e26c2f0ed3111c39c3a22167d292d04" (the performance regression fix 
> done in JDK-8374644) and "git revert  
> d3f3011d56267360d65841da3550eca79cf1575b" (the change done in JDK-7036144).
> 
> tier1, tier2, tier3 testing has completed successfully with this change. A 
> CSR has been drafted for this change 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8381671 and a release note will be added 
> too.

Hi Jai

The changes align with the original code so looks fine

-------------

Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30588#pullrequestreview-4063334514

Reply via email to