Oh thanks. I don't think I can comment on JBS entries, can I? In any case, I think the T before time is an excellent suggestion. Would that then mean that just BASIC_TIME would output something like T235959 for one second before midnight? I am fine with that, just want to double check.
On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 6:38 PM Naoto Sato <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, @rriggs made a comment in the JBS issue. > > > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8382539?focusedId=14873580&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14873580 > > Naoto > > On 5/1/26 2:08 PM, David Alayachew wrote: > > Ok @Naoto Sato <mailto:[email protected]>, looks like no one else > > has responded against this. Am I good to attempt a shot at the JBS entry? > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 4:19 PM David Alayachew > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Sounds good. Barring further discussion, I'll jump on this start of > May. > > > > Thank you again! > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 3:59 PM Naoto Sato <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > No problem. But let’s leave it for a bit in case someone else > > wants to > > jump into the discussion > > > > Naoto > > > > On 4/20/26 12:30 PM, David Alayachew wrote: > > > Wow, ty vm! > > > > > > I see that it is assigned to you -- is that something I could > > volunteer > > > to make a PR for? The implementation appears to be very > > straightforward. > > > > > > Ty again for the help and speedy response. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026, 12:46 PM Naoto Sato > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Filed an RFE: > > > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8382539 <https:// > > bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8382539> <https:// > > > bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8382539 <http://bugs.openjdk.org/ > > browse/JDK-8382539>> > > > > > > Naoto > > > > > > On 4/19/26 3:45 PM, David Alayachew wrote: > > > > Hello @core-libs-dev <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:core- <mailto:core-> > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>, > > > > > > > > The class j.t.f.DateTimeFormatter has BASIC_ISO_DATE, > > but not > > > > BASIC_ISO_DATE_TIME. That would be very useful for > saving > > > filenames, and > > > > it's weird that there are several time versions of the > > date > > > versions in the > > > > DateTimeFormatter fields section. > > > > > > > > Would this make sense to add as a new formatter field > on > > > DateTimeFormatter? > > > > > > > > Thank you for your time and consideration. > > > > David Alayachew > > > > > > >
