On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:46:56 GMT, Oli Gillespie <[email protected]> wrote:

>> While trying out some a fix for 
>> [JDK-8386278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8386278) I noticed there's 
>> no concurrency stress test for ConcurrentSkipListMap. This existing test is 
>> already suitable, it just needs a specific case added.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Oli Gillespie has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into 8386372
>  - Add test-case for ConcurrentSkipListMap

Maybe that would be ideal, but I have no line of sight to the fix for the 
nepotism issue, and this test improvement is just sitting here. I could link 
this issue to that one so it's seen by backports? It's not a strong pre-req by 
the way, just if someone says 'how did you test this CSLM fix?', with this 
change we can say it's tested.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31462#issuecomment-4742702373

Reply via email to