On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:04:13 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Simms has updated the pull request incrementally with 11 additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch '8317277' into jep401_sub_review_8317279
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>>  - 8387703: [lworld] address batch of comments in mainline PR
>>    
>>    Co-authored-by: Tobias Hartmann <[email protected]>
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann, dlong
>>  - 8387661: [lworld] move generate_return_value_stub() to SharedRuntime
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: adinn, thartmann
>>  - 8387405: [lworld] is_always_flat_in_array should be always false
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>>  - 8387686: [lworld] Update the JNI specification version for value types
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: alanb, dsimms
>>  - 8387726: [lworld] JVMTI/JDWP/JDI docs cleanup
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, cjplummer
>>  - 8387673: [lworld] C2: clone() intrinsic does not throw 
>> CloneNotSupportedException for value classes not implementing Cloneable
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>>  - 8387709: [lworld] Split Valhalla tests from tier1_compiler_3 to avoid 
>> task timeouts
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: chagedorn
>>  - 8387350: [lworld] ObjectOutputStream.writeObject() doesn't throw 
>> InvalidClassException for Serializable instance with strict init fields
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: alanb, jpai, thartmann
>>  - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8a7fdc6e...78d2bcdb
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ArrayVarHandle.java line 80:
> 
>> 78:             return Optional.empty();
>> 79: 
>> 80:         return Optional.of(VarHandleDesc.ofArray(arrayTypeRef.get()));
> 
> Would be more succinctly expressed as:
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>         return arrayType.describeConstable().map(VarHandleDesc::ofArray);

This came from the array handling of old var handle. Do you recommend tweaking 
X-VarHandle.java as well?

Edit: Seems those are already fixed

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31123#discussion_r3583115586

Reply via email to