core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8375045: Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX [v2] Sruthy Jayan
  • Re: RFR: 8375045: Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX [v2] Sruthy Jayan
  • Re: RFR: 8375045: Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8375045: Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX Sruthy Jayan
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v45] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v45] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v45] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v45] Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8378833: Improve offset arithmetic in ArraysSupport::mismatch Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8378833: Improve offset arithmetic in ArraysSupport::mismatch Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378833: Improve offset arithmetic in ArraysSupport::mismatch Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378833: Improve offset arithmetic in ArraysSupport::mismatch Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8378833: Improve offset arithmetic in ArraysSupport::mismatch Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v4] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v5] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v6] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs [v7] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: 8377907: (process) Race in ProcessBuilder can cause JVM hangs Thomas Stuefe
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v15] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Ben Perez
  • Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v6] Weijun Wang
• Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v5] Ben Perez
• Re: RFR: 8368841: X25519 implementation differs from the specification in RFC 7748 [v4] Ben Perez
• RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8378792: ObjectMethods.bootstrap missing getter validation Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8309748: Improve host selection in `External Specifications` page Hannes Wallnöfer
• Withdrawn: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Integrated: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376477: Avoid loading empty Lock classes in Shutdown and ReferenceQueue [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final Sanne Grinovero
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final [v2] Chen Liang
  • Withdrawn: 8378759: Make ZipFile.CleanableResource.inflaterCache field final Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Integrated: 8376403: Avoid loading ArrayDeque in java.util.zip.ZipFile Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8369181: InflaterOutputStream: writing after finish() results in IllegalStateException instead of an IOException Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v25] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type Luca Kellermann
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [v2] Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [v2] Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [v2] Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Integrated: 8378180: Compiling OpenJDK with C23 C-Compiler gives warning: initialization discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type Jasmine Karthikeyan
• Re: RFR: 8355536: Model preview enabled VM features in ClassFileFormatVersion [v10] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8355536: Model preview enabled VM features in ClassFileFormatVersion [v10] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8355536: Model preview enabled VM features in ClassFileFormatVersion [v10] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8378715: Use early field initialization for java.lang.invoke generated code Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v44] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8378702: jdk.test.lib.Platform.isMusl() may return false negative on Alpine Linux Frederic Thevenet
• Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v19] Liam Miller-Cushon
• Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v18] Liam Miller-Cushon
• Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v17] Liam Miller-Cushon
• RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378700: Migrate lang/annotation tests away from TestNG [v2] Daniel Fuchs
• Integrated: 8377438: [VectorAPI] Add new carrier type to LaneType class Jatin Bhateja
• Integrated: 8376234: Migrate java/lang/constant tests away from TestNG Chen Liang
• RFR: 8378698: Optimize Base64.Encoder#encodeToString Patrick Strawderman
  • Re: RFR: 8378698: Optimize Base64.Encoder#encodeToString Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8378698: Optimize Base64.Encoder#encodeToString Patrick Strawderman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages