core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v20] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v19] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v18] fabioromano1
• JDK-8200559: Offer a means for Java agents to define auxiliary classes Rafael Winterhalter
• Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Andrew Dinn
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v17] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v16] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v15] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v14] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v13] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v12] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v11] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v10] fabioromano1
• Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off wenshao
  • Re: Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off wenshao
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8368695: Support 101 switching protocol in jdk.httpserver [v13] Josiah Noel
• Withdrawn: 8368695: Support 101 switching protocol in jdk.httpserver Josiah Noel
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v21] Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v20] Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v19] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v19] Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
  • Re: RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
  • Integrated: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
• Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v6] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Tagir F . Valeev
  • Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Tagir F . Valeev
• Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v5] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v5] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v20] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v20] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v20] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v20] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v20] Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8370100: Redundant .png files in Linux app-image cause unnecessary bloat Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() [v5] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() [v5] duke
• Integrated: 8370013: Refactor Double.toHexString to eliminate regex and StringBuilder Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v7] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v7] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v8] Patricio Chilano Mateo
• HttpServer should implement AutoCloseable? David Alayachew
  • Re: HttpServer should implement AutoCloseable? Alan Bateman
  • Re: HttpServer should implement AutoCloseable? David Alayachew
  • Re: HttpServer should implement AutoCloseable? Volkan Yazıcı
  • Re: HttpServer should implement AutoCloseable? David Alayachew
• RFR: 8366364: Address inconsistencies in SSLParameters object returned by SSLConfiguration#getSSLParameters() call Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8366364: Address inconsistencies in SSLParameters object returned by SSLConfiguration#getSSLParameters() call Francesco Andreuzzi
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v8] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v7] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v5] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v6] fabioromano1
• Integrated: 8326609: New AES implementation with updates specified in FIPS 197 Shawn M Emery
• Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v6] ExE Boss
• Integrated: 8370057: Correct scale handling of BigDecimal.sqrt Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8370503: Use String.newStringWithLatin1Bytes to simplify Integer/Long toString method Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v4] Raffaello Giulietti
• Simplify toString() implementations in Integer and Long wenshao
  • Re: Simplify toString() implementations in Integer and Long Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() [v4] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() [v4] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v21] Roger Riggs
• [jpackage] Windows 11 25H2 ignores the win-menu-group option Davide Perini
  • Re: [jpackage] Windows 11 25H2 ignores the win-menu-group option Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [jpackage] Windows 11 25H2 ignores the win-menu-group option Davide Perini
  • Re: [External] : Re: [jpackage] Windows 11 25H2 ignores the win-menu-group option Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [External] : Re: [jpackage] Windows 11 25H2 ignores the win-menu-group option Davide Perini
• Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v20] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test [v4] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8343220: Add test cases to AppContentTest jpackage test Alexey Semenyuk
• Integrated: 8370156: Fix jpackage IconTest Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v3] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v3] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8368975: Windows ProcessImpl.java has dead code Francesco Andreuzzi
• RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter [v3] Chen Liang
  • Withdrawn: 8370838: Proxy invocation handler dispatching specification should be self-contained Chen Liang
  • RFR: 4397513: (reflect) InvocationHandler.invoke javadoc slightly misleading for "method" parameter Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 4397513: Misleading "interface method" in InvocationHandler specification Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v7] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Tagir F . Valeev
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Laurent Bourgès
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Piotr Tarsa
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Piotr Tarsa
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy

• Earlier messages
• Later messages