On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:26:05 GMT, Per Minborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> This PR proposes to add comments in `LazyConstants.Mutexes` so that it > becomes more evident where we have `volatile` access. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/LazyCollections.java line 606: > 604: // there was at least one unchecked exception thrown by > the > 605: // computing function. > 606: return null; The comment above is outdated? since acquireMutex can return [null](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3412d4c0dd5250f14cc6fe594355bdf2ff976417) if: > final Object mutex = mutexes.acquireMutex(offset); > if (mutex == null) { > // There might be a race where the value is already computed and > // the mutex is cleared, so we need to re-check the value again ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32069#discussion_r3670033733
