> Remove the upcall to addClass during class loading.  The comment says it's 
> only so GC can keep classes alive while the class loader is alive.  We have 
> other ways to do that. There were some JVMTI tests in the past that failed 
> without this vector but today seems to be only one test.  Maybe there's some 
> code that has a dependency on this in heap walking.
> Tested tier1-6
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 10 commits:

 - Merge branch 'master' into loader
 - Add another test to show change of behavior
 - Self review.
 - Self review.
 - Fix assert.
 - Add a test to show that the class is still found in hprof even though 
classes is not in ClassLoader.
 - Make an assert to check that stale classes aren't in loader constraint 
table, now that addClass() isn't called so no OOM possible.
 - Fix comments.
 - Fix copyrights.
 - 8391308: Remove ClassLoader.classes vector and addClass call

-------------

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32519/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=32519&range=08
  Stats: 393 lines in 10 files changed: 336 ins; 43 del; 14 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32519.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/32519/head:pull/32519

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32519

Reply via email to