On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:09:05 GMT, Tushar saini <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @viktorklang-ora right. Honestly, I would leave it as is. > > Hi @amaembo @JnRouvignac @viktorklang-ora > Thanks all for the review. Agreed the sorted specialization has little > benefit with a persistent HashSet, and I haven't benchmarked it yet. Given > the compareTo/equals compatibility concerns, what direction do you prefer for > JDK-8223933 — leave as-is, apply a full equals-based fix, or something else? > I'll update or withdraw the PR accordingly. @tusharsaini18899 My personal opinion here is that I don't think this is fixable without significant risk of semantically altering pre-existing code, so my vote is unfortunately "Leave things as they are" (unless some other solution is discovered). ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32670#issuecomment-5599649435
