On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 08:20:39 GMT, Per Minborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> This PR proposes to correct an error in the documentation of `MemorySegment`, > which was likely a copy/paste error. In order to avoid such errors in the > future, the PR also proposes to collect the return documentation under a > single `@return` tag rather than having duplicate text. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/MemorySegment.java line 735: > 733: > 734: /** > 735: * {@return a new memory segment that has the same address and scope > as this segment, Sorryfor coming a bit late to the party. Should the first mention of "scope" (in the javadoc of this class) link to `{@link #MemorySegment.Scope scope}`? (Apologies, the syntax of the link is probably incorrect) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32726#discussion_r3966439369
