On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:49:11 GMT, Axel Boldt-Christmas <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> Reopened Valhalla PR which did not go in before the code freeze 
>> (openjdk/valhalla#2405).
>> 
>> The original PR was review by @jsikstro and @johan-sjolen. 
>>> There are few places which uses the fully qualified name for the 
>>> AsValueClass annotation. As a result the plugging does not modify these 
>>> classes when compiling, so they are still identity classes.
>>>
>>> I propose improving the robustness of this plugin. We need to do this 
>>> during parsing so we cannot actually check 100% that it will resolve to the 
>>> correct annotation. However we can do a best effort, which handles same 
>>> package, fully qualified, imported and rejects other annotations with the 
>>> same class name.
>> 
>> This only adapts the current ValueClassPlugin to be more robust, there might 
>> be room for improving how we do this Value class transformation in some 
>> other way.
>> 
>> * Testing
>>   * Verified that enable preview testing classes are transformed, including 
>> `gc/stress/gcbasher` which was missed before this change.
>>   * Testing tests with annotation with and without enable preview
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Axel Boldt-Christmas has updated the pull request with a new target base due 
> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains nine additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream_jdk/master' into JDK-8384068
>  - Fix annotation which were missed by the current parser
>  - Remove the ValueClassPlugin changes
>  - Revert ValueClassPlugin changes
>  - Working test
>  - Try add value class plugin test
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream_jdk/master' into JDK-8384068
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream_jdk/master' into JDK-8384068
>  - 8384068: ValueClassPlugin misses some annotations

Marked as reviewed by jsjolen (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32214#pullrequestreview-5245415498

Reply via email to