On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:47:53 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Three options were suggested about the new API: >> - ListFormat.formatting() >> - ListFormat.toCollector() >> - Collectors.listFormatting(ListFormat) static method >> I feel it should belong to ListFormat, but I'm open to discussions. >> >> For testing, I tested a couple of scenarios and a few corner cases (empty >> stream, null element, parallel stream) in a simple non-parameterized JUnit >> test. I believe that it's enough, given that the implementation is trivial, >> and ListFormat itself, as well as Stream API is already thoroughly tested by >> other tests. Tell me if you feel that some testing scenarios are missing, >> I'll happily add them. >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Tagir F. Valeev has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > 8391789: Test for Collectors.joining((ListFormat)null) After discussion, I updated the PR. Now, the new collector is named as `Collectors.joining(ListFormat)`. I feel it's the best option. As Rémi noticed, the overload ambiguity should not be the problem. The PR description is updated above. Additionally, a small unrelated typo in the ListFormat.format spec is fixed. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32716#issuecomment-5740595136
