On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:45:40 GMT, Mat Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Mat Carter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Explicit timeout of 60 >> >> Updated test run commands to include a timeout of 60 seconds. > > Given that this PR finishes the work started in JDK-8386428 and tests pass, > I'd like to ask for a review so we can close this out. > > Subsequently I'm happy to work on and test the investigation into using > volatile; although as it isn't to address a bug, @DougLea it would be great > if you would provide the issue title/description that you feel best describes > the effort. @macarte I'm running some stress tests, will report back when I have the results. I think naming the follow-up JBS-issue something to the effect of "Transition LinkedTransferQueue.DualNode.waiter to being volatile instead of using explicit volatile accesses" @macarte Stress-testing open/test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/LinkedTransferQueue/TransferRemove.java passed, still waiting for a more complete jdk_concurrent stress-test to complete. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33551#issuecomment-6476067175 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33551#issuecomment-6476096889
