core-libs-dev
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
RFR: 8333398: Uncomment the commented test in test/jdk/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8333398: Uncomment the commented test in test/jdk/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
Iris Clark
Re: RFR: 8333398: Uncomment the commented test in test/jdk/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
Lance Andersen
Re: RFR: 8333398: Uncomment the commented test in test/jdk/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
Jaikiran Pai
Integrated: 8333398: Uncomment the commented test in test/jdk/java/util/jar/JarFile/mrjar/MultiReleaseJarAPI.java
Jaikiran Pai
RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of new DecimalFormat and DecimalFormat.format
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of new DecimalFormat and DecimalFormat.format [v2]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of new DecimalFormat and DecimalFormat.format [v2]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of new DecimalFormat and DecimalFormat.format [v2]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
kuaiwei
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
kuaiwei
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v3]
kuaiwei
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v4]
Brent Christian
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v5]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v6]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v7]
lingjun-cg
Withdrawn: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v8]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v9]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v10]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v10]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v10]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v11]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v12]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v13]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v13]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v13]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v13]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v14]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v14]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v14]
Iris Clark
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v15]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v15]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v16]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v16]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v16]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v16]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v17]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v17]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v17]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v17]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Performance regression of DecimalFormat.format [v17]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v17]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v18]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v18]
Justin Lu
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v19]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v20]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
Roger Riggs
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting [v21]
duke
Integrated: 8333396: Use StringBuilder internally for java.text.Format.* formatting
lingjun-cg
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Severin Gehwolf
Re: RFR: 8311302: Allow for jlinking a custom runtime without packaged modules being present [v29]
Alan Bateman
RFR: 8327854: Test java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/WhileOpStatefulTest.java failed with RuntimeException
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8327854: Test java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/WhileOpStatefulTest.java failed with RuntimeException
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8327854: Test java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/WhileOpStatefulTest.java failed with RuntimeException
Paul Sandoz
Integrated: 8327854: Test java/util/stream/test/org/openjdk/tests/java/util/stream/WhileOpStatefulTest.java failed with RuntimeException
Viktor Klang
RFR: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading [v2]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading [v3]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading [v3]
Lance Andersen
Re: RFR: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading [v3]
Jaikiran Pai
Integrated: 8026127: Deflater/Inflater documentation incomplete/misleading
Jaikiran Pai
Withdrawn: 8331879: Clean up non-standard use of /// comments in `java.base`
xiaotaonan
RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexander Matveev
Integrated: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8331977: Crash: SIGSEGV in dlerror()
Alexey Semenyuk
RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API
ExE Boss
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API
Joe Darcy
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v2]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v2]
Chen Liang
Integrated: 8331879: Clean up non-standard use of /// comments in `java.base`
Jonathan Gibbons
Integrated: 8314480: Memory ordering spec updates in java.lang.ref
Brent Christian
Integrated: 8332110: [macos] jpackage tries to sign added files without the --mac-sign option
Alexander Matveev
Re: RFR: 8314480: Memory ordering spec updates in java.lang.ref [v35]
Brent Christian
Re: RFR: 8331879: Clean up non-standard use of /// comments in `java.base` [v2]
Iris Clark
Re: RFR: 8331879: Clean up non-standard use of /// comments in `java.base` [v2]
Joe Darcy
RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Sean Gwizdak
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Sean Gwizdak
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Per Minborg
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Per Minborg
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Per Minborg
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Claes Redestad
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Sean Gwizdak
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
ExE Boss
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Aleksey Shipilev
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Sean Gwizdak
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Aleksey Shipilev
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
duke
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Sean Gwizdak
Integrated: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode
Sean Gwizdak
RFR: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3 [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3 [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3 [v2]
Jaikiran Pai
Integrated: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3
Daniel Fuchs
Re: Question on Lambda function
Zhengyu Gu
Re: Question on Lambda function
Chen Liang
Re: Question on Lambda function
Zhengyu Gu
Re: RFR: 8314480: Memory ordering spec updates in java.lang.ref [v22]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Doug Lea
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Doug Lea
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Doug Lea
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Doug Lea
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v17]
Viktor Klang
RFR: 8333312: Incorrect since tags on new ClassReader and ConstantPool methods
David M . Lloyd
Re: RFR: 8333312: Incorrect since tags on new ClassReader and ConstantPool methods
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8333312: Incorrect since tags on new ClassReader and ConstantPool methods
Adam Sotona
Integrated: 8333312: Incorrect since tags on new ClassReader and ConstantPool methods
David M . Lloyd
Re: RFR: 8322732: ForkJoinPool may underutilize cores in async mode [v16]
Doug Lea
RFR: 8333334: C2: Make result of `Node::dominates` more precise to enhance scalar replacement
MaxXing
Re: RFR: 8333334: C2: Make result of `Node::dominates` more precise to enhance scalar replacement
Tobias Hartmann
Re: RFR: 8333334: C2: Make result of `Node::dominates` more precise to enhance scalar replacement [v2]
MaxXing
Re: RFR: 8333334: C2: Make result of `Node::dominates` more precise to enhance scalar replacement [v2]
MaxXing
Re: RFR: 8333334: C2: Make result of `Node::dominates` more precise to enhance scalar replacement [v3]
MaxXing
RFR: 8333130: MakeJAR2.sh uses hard-coded JDK version
Jaikiran Pai
Earlier messages
Later messages