> On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:45 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 14:23:41 -0500, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >> >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:21 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: >>> >>> That's interesting. I thought someone had already tried travis and our >>> test suite took too long to run. Sounds like Kushal's stuff could be >>> hooked up to gitlab. >> >> Unless I did it wrong, the tests took 11 minutes to run, Travis allows up to >> 50. >> >> https://travis-ci.org/fake-python/cpython/jobs/89432399 > > That looks OK. Maybe they changed their limits? 50 sounds way longer > than I remember whoever it was (Kushal?) quoting. >
It’s been 50 minutes for as long as I can remember, but there is an additional limit of 10 minutes without any output, so if it was being run in a way that didn’t cause output to occur for 10 minutes it’d get killed. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
