On 7 October 2016 at 13:26, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That note about "make sure it looks good" reminded me that "make >> patchcheck" is going to need updating to handle git, which means >> updating Tools/scripts/patchcheck.py >> >> Brett, how would you like that extra task captured - PR to PEP 512? > > I just checked, `make patchcheck` works fine from a Git checkout.
Could, if it basically works already, we probably don't need to note it anywhere. My comment was based on the fact that there are references to both Mercurial and Mercurial Queues in the patchcheck source code, but I didn't look in detail at what they actually do. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
