Yep, and it's a known issue. If you look at the devinabox README you will see there are complex instructions o how to work around it, but since they are theoretically brittle I didn't bother setting it up.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, 03:36 Antoine Pitrou, <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:08:48 +0000 > Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > I have both Codecov and Coveralls up and running. If you have an > > opinion/preference, please vote at > > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/issues/27 using the > > reactions on the appropriate comment (.e.g +1/-1 reaction for Codecov > > and/or Coveralls). Links to the code coverage results are in the issue. > If > > people want to see how they interact with PRs, feel free to look at > > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/pull/32 (once the CI run > is > > finished). > > There are interesting oddities, such as coverage for the toplevel of > weakref.py: > > https://codecov.io/gh/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/src/065dc67d234b5550fb847b79a963d13b90002787/Lib/weakref.py > > I presume weakref is being imported early in the interpreter > initialization process, when coverage hasn't been enabled yet? > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list > core-workflow@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct >
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct