Codecov was the clear winner among people who left a reaction on the issue and it's also my personal choice, so the code coverage reporter has been chosen! Thanks to everyone who helped out with it.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 12:08 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > I have both Codecov and Coveralls up and running. If you have an > opinion/preference, please vote at > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/issues/27 using the > reactions on the appropriate comment (.e.g +1/-1 reaction for Codecov > and/or Coveralls). Links to the code coverage results are in the issue. If > people want to see how they interact with PRs, feel free to look at > https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/pull/32 (once the CI run > is finished). >
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
