On 9 February 2017 at 18:42, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >> +1: Nick, Senthil, Chris >> +0: ... >> -0: Martin, Brett >> -1: Naoki, Berker > > Since we don't get clickable links any way about it, -1 on rewriting > commit messages. Too easy to accidentally mess things up for no real > benefit.
Rewriting the history means we *do* get clickable links for anyone that wants them, as a distinctive string like "bpo-12345" is amenable to automated conversion into a hyperlink via a client side script in GreaseMonkey or similar. You can't readily do that with "#12345" or even "Issue #12345" because they're too generic. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
