On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > OK, executive decision: let's test a rewrite but only for things that match > the regex at the beginning of the commit message (using Senthil's long list > of possible formats so we get "bpo-NNNN" and not "Issue bpo-NNNN"). That > won't have any false-positives and still gets us consistent issue naming for > the whole repo (at least in the commit summary line, but that will also act > as a scope to the commit that any ambiguous "#NNNN" numbers apply to bpo). > If this test doesn't lead to people being happy we will abandon the idea of > any history rewriting for tomorrow.
Note that matching only the beginning of the message will miss several recent commits like: https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7b8df4a5d81d https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/31342913fb1e https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/37705f89c72b There is also the issue of multiple issue numbers in a message: https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a5538734cc87 https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ffc0840762e4 -- Zach _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
