+1 On Feb 10, 2017 6:00 AM, "Senthil Kumaran" <sent...@uthcode.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> > wrote: > > Please view the output of commit logs converted here > > http://orsenthil.github.io/cpython-hg-to-git/ and see if it looks > > better than the status quo. > > In addition to the random sampling of the commit logs, here is the > complete repo converted > while the commit message re-write: > > https://github.com/orsenthil/cpython-migration-test3 > > Both commit log samples and the repo conversion looks good to me > And I am in favor of going ahead with this approach. +1 as it was > previously too. > > Since seeing the commit log conversion yesterday, I suspect more > people would be +1 one. > > If any of you were -1 yesterday and you changed your mind after seeing > the results, please take chance to explicitly toggle your vote. > -- > Senthil > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list > core-workflow@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct >
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
