On 19 June 2017 at 09:02, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017, 09:56 Mariatta Wijaya, <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> At some point in the future, we >>>> could potentially even go to an OpenStack style flow where Bedevere >>>> actually *merges* patches in this state if their CI run succeeds, >> >> >> One concern is about cleaning up the commit message before merging, >> something core devs can/should do. >> How will this work if the PR get merged automatically by Bedevere? > > If people want to talk about this then let's keep it to the issue on GH as > it's totally speculative ATM and I would like to keep this thread on-topic.
Sorry, yeah, that was a complete tangent. I was mainly trying to explain why I think we genuinely need a core developer's review before promoting a PR that far in the process. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
