Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 01.10.2009 01:07, ron minnich wrote: > >> Yes, I'm sorry, we keep board support, but stop worrying about huge >> SPI anbd weird accessing of it. >> >> As for fallback: we really need to bring it back at some point. I'm >> speaking as someone whose life was saved because I did not destroy a >> 1024-node cluster with a bad bios image. >> >> CBFS will give us a normal/fallback setup that people can understand. >> >> > > Could we simply reuse arch/x86/stage1.c from v3 and run a search+replace > lar->cbfs on that file? As a nice side benefit, we get global variables > and similar stuff. >
No search and replace blind copy of non-fitting code please. The least we can use in v2 right now is a code quality drop to v3 level .. One step after the other.. It's not enough to have one board running. If you have a solution to safely bring over 200 boards, please do it! Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
