Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 02.10.2009 11:54, Patrick Georgi wrote: > >> We need to have access to CMOS before CAR or raminit, or anything >> interesting happens, really. And I'm not sure if our code supports >> this everywhere already. >> > > IMHO access to CMOS before CAR is unnecessarily painful and I'd like to > keep that out of the targets which don't need it (VIA/AMD). >
Then how are we going to update CAR code in case a new CPU revision needs an update while still keeping normal/fallback alive? Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
