Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 05.10.2009 14:56, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >> Peter Stuge wrote: >> >> >>>> another course of action (eg. moving the tools into the coreboot v2 >>>> repository, so everyone gets them), >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not >>> put them back in again. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them separate: >> >> > > Sorry, -ENOPARSE. Are you saying they should not be separate from each > other or they should not be separate from the v2 tree? > The latter. >> * nvramtool >> * superiotool >> * getpir >> * mptable >> * inteltool >> * ectool >> and maybe also for msrtool. We can put that in a separate repository, >> too, if you prefer it to be not associated with coreboot directly. >> >> > > I think a common coreboot-utils repo would be great, but having them in > a not-checked-out-by-default-with-v2 directory in the v2 repo is > absolutely OK for me. >
But why? It's possible to just check out svn://coreboot.org/repos/trunk/coreboot-v2/utils as it is possible to check out svn://coreboot.org/repos/trunk/utils Especially stuff like (our modified versions of) mptable and getpir make no sense outside the scope of coreboot. Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
