Peter Stuge wrote: > Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >>> No - please don't do that. We're trying to make them separate, not >>> put them back in again. >>> >> For the following utilities it does not make sense to keep them >> separate: >> >> * nvramtool >> * superiotool >> * getpir >> * mptable >> * inteltool >> * ectool >> and maybe also for msrtool. >> > > Ie. all that are external. :) > > But.. Um, what are you proposing? > > > >> We can put that in a separate repository, too, if you prefer it to >> be not associated with coreboot directly. >> > > Hm. If there is a single util place I think that's where msrtool > should go, associated or not.. Or? But if there are several util > places I am already confused.. > > Was it a mistake to create trunk/util? > > I think so... it did not help.. the only difference is now all those tools are not checked out by a coreboot checkout anymore.
I believe we should svn mv coreboot-v2 coreboot-devel and svn mv util/* coreboot-v2/util Any acks? Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
