Nobody is stopping anyone from implementing and letting us try something open. I think it's great. I would love to be able to use it.
But some rules apply: o a lot of us have full time jobs and (in my case at least) a skill set that does not include competence/interest in hacking on meeting software. It has to work for me as EASILY as what we are using today. o it has to work at least as WELL as what we're using today. So far, every single open source alternative has not come close to meeting that standard. o And, to reiterate, no single points of failure. It seems to me that anything that depends on one person providing 24x7 availability has a single point of failure by definition. And, in at least one case, we went to have a meeting and the (non-redundant) person running the (non-redundant) server connected to the (non-redundant) network was not around. No meeting occurred. That's a failure.
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
