https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM, <ttu...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote: > >> To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent >> LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the >> LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the >> license info is being collected these days (e.g. for >> chrome://os-credits [3]). >> >> > Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are involved > I need to ask a direct question. > Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority would > suffice) state on this thread > that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)? > > I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and > answered, I'm just trying > to satisfy our internal legal group. > > Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required to > satisfy the lawyers > if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge. Which I > will be happy to > add once I'm able to start contributing to the project. > Cheers, > T.mike > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the >>> original question, which boils down to Read The Source? >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot >>> <coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM, <ttu...@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote: >>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the >>> various >>> licenses, etc. >>> >>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the >>> Depthcharge tree. >>> >>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later). >>> >>> How would I confirm this with an online source? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> T.mike >>> >>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot >>> list? >>> >> >> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository have licenses at >> the top of each file. They are GPLv2. >> >> Cheers, >>> T.mike >>> >>> -- >>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org >>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2] >>> >> -- >> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org >> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2] >> -- >> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org >> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2] >> >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] http://coreboot.org >> [2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >> [3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses >> >
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot