On 2017-12-24 05:27, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
This commit got merged and the Depthcharge now should have the
requested license files
at its root directory. Dear friend, please let us learn about your
device once it is released,
maybe some of the coreboot developers would want to get your device -
to use, and possibly help
Best regards,
Ivan Ivanov
Forgive my lack of list etiquette.
With this commit, my legal department is satisfied and has given
engineering the green light.
Will share details on project as and when I can.
Thanks all who responded and contributed to resolving issue raised by
this thread.
Cheers,
T.mike
2017-12-21 21:34 GMT+03:00 Aaron Durbin via coreboot
<coreboot@coreboot.org>:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM, <ttu...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:
To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a
non-existent
LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
chrome://os-credits [3]).
Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are
involved
I need to ask a direct question.
Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority
would
suffice) state on this thread
that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?
I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and
answered, I'm just trying
to satisfy our internal legal group.
Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required
to
satisfy the lawyers
if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.
Which I
will be happy to
add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
Cheers,
T.mike
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
original question, which boils down to Read The Source?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
<coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM, <ttu...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
various
licenses, etc.
There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
Depthcharge tree.
My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
How would I confirm this with an online source?
Cheers,
T.mike
Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
list?
Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository have licenses at
the top of each file. They are GPLv2.
Cheers,
T.mike
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
Links:
------
[1] http://coreboot.org
[2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
[3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot