Sadly the ARM processor also have the ME-like backdoor (called "TrustZone). And even MIPS is going this road soon (check out the "MIPS OmniShield" news).
Could it be the requirement of US Government - for all the consumer CPU to have backdoors ? My last hopes are on POWER 9 and RISC V now ; meanwhile sticking to the AMD pre-PSP tech Best regards, Ivan Ivanov 2017-12-23 15:08 GMT+03:00 Alberto Bursi <[email protected]>: > > > On 12/23/2017 11:54 AM, Nico Huber wrote: >> On 23.12.2017 11:39, Nico Huber wrote: >>> [1] I'm convinced that this is easily doable. At least compared to the >>> effort you already put in liberating the unliberatable. If the i.MX8 >>> turns out to be as controllable and well documented as the i.MX6, >>> you'd be catapulted towards the end of your freedom roadmap. >>> >> Now that I've looked at your roadmap again, there's a flaw at the >> beginning: AUIU, at least Acer, Dell, HP and Lenovo sell products >> that are on par with yours (Chromebooks). Actually you're basing >> your firmware on their investments into it. So it seems unfair to >> list them there. Some even sell ARM devices that are far ahead (in >> terms of freedom and owner-controllability; not in your roadmap >> because that has a very weird order). >> >> Nico >> > > Meh, chromebooks aren't exactly powerful systems anyway. Also I don't > know other ARM devices that are more free than ARM chromebooks (again > not really powerful systems). > > -Alberto > -- > coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
