Hi,
It's an M-key slot and I'm currently running an XPG SX8200 Pro in it right
now, so it's definitely got x4 PCIe...

R

On Sun, Dec 8, 2019, 15:25 Matt B <matthewwbradl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As somebody who's abused the hell out of pcie extenders (I have over three
> meters of pcie-over-cheap-usb3.0-cable in one box) I've never had an
> obvious issue so it seems pretty tolerant. You probably just won't get the
> same transfer speed.
>
> I would check if any drives you have show up as being attached to pcie
> instead of sata when in that slot.
> Also double check it's keying. If the keying of the slot is such that it
> can't even accept an nvme drive, then there's your answer right there.
>
> Sincerely,
>     -Matt
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 6:12 PM Rafael Send <flyingfishfin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>> I used the mini PCIe -> x1PCIe version with the same cable length from
>> the same people to test the card in the WiFi slot successfully, so I doubt
>> that it is a signal integrity problem.
>>
>> I'll try to build against coreboot master on Monday and see what happens.
>>
>> How can I get the sort of logs that would help here out of coreboot?
>> I'll be building with Tianocore.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafael
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 04:58 Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> On 07.12.19 07:40, Rafael Send wrote:
>>> > However, so far nothing I've done lets me detect the Sunix card if I
>>> try to
>>> > put it in the NVME slot using this adapter
>>> > <https://www.adt.link/product/R42.html>. I would think it should just
>>> show
>>> > up under "lspci" like it does in the WiFi slot, but it does not.
>>>
>>> have you tried the adapter with another device yet? Though, even if it
>>> did work, from above link:
>>>
>>>    "1. All kinds of Motherboard and equipment condition such as signal
>>>     driving ability is different, the results of our test does not
>>>     guarantee that it is the same as your test results. You need to
>>>     know, as long as using a extension cable, the signal will have a
>>>     loss. The buyer who requires perfectly, please don't buy."
>>>
>>> So they know, that board design matters for the compatibility of their
>>> adapter. I'm a mere software developer, so could be totally wrong about
>>> this: PCIe rates are now that high that the trace length between chips
>>> can get longer than a wavelength. Doesn't mean it can't work, but there
>>> may be things to take special care of and I don't know if regular PCIe
>>> ports are prepared for it. In other words, lightspeed might be too slow
>>> to make things like this plug'n'play :D
>>>
>>> > I have not tried the latest Coreboot / port yet, but I figured I might
>>> as
>>> > well get some opinions on the subject.
>>>
>>> Still worth a shot, imho. You never know what a proprietary BIOS does.
>>> And even if it doesn't work, coreboot logs can give some insight.
>>>
>>> Nico
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
>>
>
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

Reply via email to