s/code/core/, lol.
On 6/20/20 2:46 PM, Evgeny Zinoviev via coreboot wrote:
Could be... Thanks for testing!
I've also put it on some of my daily work machines: a quad-code Ivy
and a dual-code Sandy in order to see how it works in a real world...
Works so far. So if it doesn't end up crashing in a week or two I'd
say it's stable. We'll see.
On 6/20/20 1:42 PM, Lars Hochstetter wrote:
Update II:
All tests passed with and without HT enabled!
I discovered something curious though - if I disable HT memtest86+
finishes a pass in 45ish minutes. If I enable HT it takes 4+ hours.
I don't know if it's due to coreboot or memtest86+ as memtest86+
v5.01 also took around 4+ hours for all tests with HT enabled.
Maybe it is a bug with memtest86+ ?
On 19.06.20 00:58, Lars Hochstetter wrote:
Update: I managed to get memtest86+ v5.31b running.
I downloaded the .iso.zip and used geteltorito v0.6 to turn the .iso
file into a 1.44meg floppy image. I then added the floppy image like
the memtest86+ v5.01 floppy image to my coreboot image (4.12 +
patchset 15).
Preliminary tests with memtest86+ v5.31b went without an issue
(Note: I didn't run all the tests, but test #7 was passed with and
without HT).
I'll try to run all tests with and without HT on 4.12 + patchset 15
around the weekend.
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
